W2-3/3 Mass Introduction (7/6)

 Friday seemed to be the emptiest day for the office yet, with little to do an employee decided it would be good for me to talk to a bunch of different employees and to introduce myself. Thus, I went around to a lot of different employees within my department and related to my department and introduced myself. In general, most talks were just brief introductions. I would maybe talk about my major but rarely much else. I was asked by one employee my hobbies and interests. Other than that, I did little more than introducing myself as an intern and shake their hand. I thanked them for their time.

    Once I finished my introductions, I had a better idea of the overall layout of everything and a more detailed feel for the office culture. I feel like everybody is very nice and inviting in general. People seem to really be courteous to me as an intern and I really appreciate it.

    In my previous internship I was just a place holder and courtesy were rare. In short, I was just a simple lackey. Here I actually feel like a welcomed potential future employee and I feel as if my potential here is far better suited than with my previous internship. I mean no offense to my previous internship. To me it is just a very apparent comparison.

   I feel good about my prospects and would like to pursue employment here soon after graduation if possible. I can see myself working in this environment and my interest in cyber security is great enough that I can see myself working in this field. I really want to get a Security + certification soon.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

W7-2/3 On Being Prepared & Further Recommendations (8/11)

   One can never be fully prepared. There is always more that a person can do to prepare themselves. I wish that before starting this internship that I would have had a better understanding of the basic concepts of cyber security (e.g. passive and active defense, vulnerability factors, etc.). I also wish that I had prior experience with all the tools and software I used. If you can find out the tools used at an internship, then it’s a good idea to try and learn some of those tools. Your internship will require less training and more application which will make the experience more productive for you. If you cannot find out what tools your internship will use, then it isn’t a bad idea to browse freeware related to that field (e.g. Maltego and Zed Attack Proxy for digital forensics and pen testing respectively). Most places are trying to save money, so they probably use freeware to some capacity. The most popular freeware is your best bet and even if they don’t use it, the...
Read more

W2-2/3 Network Mapping (7/5)

On Thursday we covered network mapping. The process of network mapping usually consists of four phases: identify the space of IP addresses you are monitoring and partition the space into different categories (1). Examine the IP space (2), identify blind and confusing traffic (3), and identify clients and servers (4).    During phase one the mapping of the inventory is undetermined and remains to be IP space. A security inventory should monitor every resource's address (that it is able to) on the network (i.e. anything within or on the network an attacker can access), what resources a service is running on, at the very minimum. During phase two cyber security personal should also consider enumerating roles to make searching easier; identifying VPNs, NATs, DHCP, and proxies; keep centrality or volume metrics (e.g. monthly ephemeral summaries); per-host white lists; and monitoring the versions of all services on a particular resource. Ask what addresses make up the network?...
Read more

W1-2/3 Prioritization (6/27)

   On Wednesday we covered prioritization. What is the most important thing to respond to first? How do we determine what is and what isn't more important? How do we assess the risk being taken? How much risk is too much risk? While some matters may be more general, a lot of prioritization will be based upon what the establishment is doing, who would target them, what resources does the establishment have for defense, etc. The effectiveness of cyber response teams is determined by how appropriate the prioritization of incidents is. Randomly responding and less formalized response protocols/orders (e.g. stacks/LIFO or queues/FIFO) will hinder the potential security capabilities of an establishment. One cannot prioritize for random or abstract orders and expect any type of long-term success. It is best to make decision making and risk taking as formalized as possible. What you do is just as important as what you do first. Basically, some things are more important to attend to ri...
Read more